May 20, 2012

Obama Surrenders to Republican Demands and Stops Regulation on Clean Air

Article by Anyele

Obama Surrenders to Republican Demands and Stops Regulation on Clean Air – Business

Search by Author, Title or Content

Article ContentAuthor NameArticle Title

Home
Submit Articles
Author Guidelines
Publisher Guidelines
Content Feeds
RSS Feeds
FAQ
Contact Us

President Obama in a dramatic back gear move has succumbed to demands of the Republican Party and gone back on his promises about regulations on clean air. Its target was to deal with smog that threatened health. The Republicans loudly protested that such regulations would kill prospects of generating of jobs while the economy of the country continues to ail.

The withdrawal of the regulation proposal was one among the latest chain of retreats by Obama in the teeth Republican opposition. The liberals were quick to criticize him. Environmentalists had been one of his key supporting groups. They accused Obama of surrendering to Wall Street polluters. Threats were issued by the American Lung Association to start again legal measures against the rules that had been proposed by the previous president – George Bush.

The Republican legislators together with industry hawks have been putting heavy pressure on Obama for doing away with strict regulations on clean air; their plea is that it will harm the job sector. The Environmental Protection Agency had always been in favour of stricter controls. It had forecast that the suggested change would entail costs touching $ 90 billion annually – making this the costliest environmental law ever introduced in USA.

However EPA has been barred by the Clean Air Act from mulling over the costs of implementation when public health was at stake.

Obama explained that he took this decision partly because of the burdens of regulations and uncertainty haunting the economy of the country.

A new recent report indicated that no jobs had been added last August while the unemployment rate persisted to hover at 9.1%.

If the regulation had been introduced it would have brought down ground-level ozone concentrations – one of the main reasons for smog that cause asthma and other breathing problems in humans. Smog is generated from emissions made by cars, power as well as chemical plants, factories and refineries, combining with the rays of the sun and heat.

The concessions granted by Obama to the Republican legislators about extension of tax cuts of the Bush era, and his agreeing to spending cuts to the tune of $ 1 trillion, had already emboldened them to hit out at stricter smog regulations when they came back after Labor Day.

The spokesperson of the House John Boehner (Republican/Ohio) praised White House for withdrawing the regulations pertaining to smog. He said this was a laudable first step towards removal of obstacles standing in the path of business.

About the Author

Anyele, has been working on real estate owned properties, studying the foreclosures market and helping buyers in their purchases.

Use and distribution of this article is subject to our Publisher Guidelines
whereby the original author’s information and copyright must be included.

Anyele



RSS Feed


Report Article


Publish Article


Print Article


Add to Favorites

Article Directory
About
FAQ
Contact Us
Advanced Search
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer

GoArticles.com © 2012, All Rights Reserved.

Anyele, has been working on real estate owned properties, studying the foreclosures market and helping buyers in their purchases.












Use and distribution of this article is subject to our Publisher Guidelines
whereby the original author’s information and copyright must be included.

Find More Obama Articles

Obama approval rating continues to fade

A poll released on Thursday found that President Barack Obama slipped with voters in August and is now upside down as he prepares to run for re-election in 2012.

The poll from Quinnipiac University found 52 % of those surveyed disapproved of the job Obama was doing while 42% backed the president. In July, a poll from Quinnipiac found that 47% approved of Obama’s performance in the White House while 46% disapproved. While Democrats rally behind Obama and Republicans remain opposed, the President is upside down among independent voters. Only 40% of independents approved of the president’s job while 54% disapproved of his performance.

Peter Brown, the assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute, said these numbers should alarm the president and his supporters.

“President Barack Obama has hit a low 42% approval in the past but this is his highest disapproval rating,” Brown said.

“Ominous for him is that the share of voters who think he has strong leadership qualities has dropped from 64 to 33% in January to 50 to 48% now. While half of the voters say that he cares about their problems, the statistic is not impressive since it is a measure on which Democratic presidents historically rate well.

“When Quinnipiac University asked that question about Obama in November of 2008, he received a 70 – 22% positive score on understanding the needs of average folks,” continued Brown. “The best news for the president is that voters still blame former President George W. Bush rather than Obama for the economy by 53 to 32%. One can only imagine what Obama’s approval rating might look like if that ever changes.”

The poll found that Americans of both sexes disapprove of the president. Only 39% of men surveyed and 44% of women approved of Obama. While 86% of blacks and 56% of Hispanics approved of the president, 61% of whites disapproved of him. Obama was upside down with all voters in the poll save those younger than 35.

“Men, whites and independent voters were the president’s weak spots when his job approval was positive and those groups have progressed from being weak spots to being serious problems,” Brown said. “Of course, the way to improve his standing among those voters is the same recipe for success among the entire electorate — an improving economy.”

As Brown noted, Obama is not being helped by the economy. Back in a poll taken by Quinnipiac in January, 36% of those surveyed insisted the economy was getting better while 20% said it was worsening. In the new poll, 49% maintain that the economy is worsening while only 11% maintain that it is improving. 76% of those surveyed thought the nation was in a recession.

There was some good news in the poll for Obama: 44% thought the president would manage the economy better than would the congressional Republicans and 40% thought the Republicans in Congress would do a better job with the economy.

When matched against Republican presidential hopeful Rick Perry, 43% thought Obama would do a better job on the economy while 41% thought the Texas governor would. Former Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts, who is also running for the Republican nomination, was more trusted on the economy than Obama. While 42% thought Obama would do a better job, Mitt Romney inched past him with a 46% rating.

Despite Obama’s poor approval rating, voters remained divided over the President, with 47% seeing him as favorable and the same number seeing him as not. That still puts Obama in better shape than congressional leaders such as U.S. House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, favorable at 22%, GOP’s leader in the U.S. Senate, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, favorable by 14% and unfavorable by 23%. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., was seen in an unfavorable light by 36% while only 18% saw him as favorable. A clear majority — 52%– saw House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California as unfavorable versus her 24% favorable rating.

The Tea Party movement was upside down as well, with 42% seeing it as unfavorable while 29% thought it was favorable. Despite that, the tea party — of which 12% of those surveyed said they considered themselves a member — still did better than the two major parties: 51% saw the Democrats as unfavorable and 53% saw the Republicans as such.

“The Tea Party got a lot of negative publicity during the debt-ceiling negotiations and most American voters either don’t like the group or don’t know enough about it to make a decision,” Brown said. “Voters do know the Democratic and Republican parties — and they don’t like either one.”

The poll of 2,730 registered voters was taken from Aug. 16-27 and had  a margin of error of +/- 1.9 percent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

This update on Obama’s approval ratings was written by Kevin Derby for Sunshine State News and published September 2, 2011. Stay up-to-date on the latest governmental issues – and Rick Scott news with Sunshine State News, the online source for Florida news and politics. SSN examines the relationship between Florida politics and business and provides commentary from a conservative viewpoint. The premiere news source speaks to an audience of lawmakers, lobbyists, business and opinion leaders, and Floridians who expect to hold their leaders accountable and for them to make pragmatic decisions. Read Rick Scott news and other work by Kevin Derby at SunshineStateNews.com. Reach Kevin Derby at kderby@sunshinestatenews.com or at (850) 727-0859.

Obama’s Abomonible Obamanomics

Article by Gene Lalor

Ever wonder when you wake up in the morning if we’re blessed to be living in a rare age of wonderment, of great innovations and unprecedented progress? Or is ours a cursed era where little makes sense, where up is down, where truths are lies, where the formerly-understood has degenerated into massive confusion?

Our age is all of the above, though the nonsensical, falsehoods, misrepresentations, and confusions have upstaged innovative progress, taken center stage, and are evolving into the norm.

When President Barack Hussein Obama unequivocably declared in August, 2009 that the United States should never raise taxes during a recession, he seemed, even to me, sincere. When he said, “The last thing you want to do is raise taxes during a recession,” he seemed to believe what most rational people think, that the very thought of any government taxing money out of an already-reeling economy was incomprehensible.

That was then, this is now.

Two years later, with America’s economy still in pitiful shape, unemployment stuck at over 9%, poverty on the rise, the under-employed numbering some 26 million, those who hire not hiring for fear of the future, food stamps being doled out like candy at Halloween, the nation’s credit rating lower than ever before, our president is proposing $ 1.6 trillion in new tax levies.

Fear not, however. Those taxes, which he pledged would never be exacted during a recession, will only burden the filthy rich, i.e., anyone earning more than his constituents. The 45% of American workers who don’t pay a dime in federal income taxes now will continue to save that dime under his scheme and the wealthy would finally cough up their fair share.

Obama never lets facts intrude on his socialist ideology and intentionally ignores an Associated Press report which puts the lie to his populist soak-the-rich gambit.

The same AP that has twisted news to his advantage since 2007 exposed Obama for a tax charlatan by revealing the truth.

According to the CBO, “On average, the wealthiest people in America pay a lot more taxes than the middle class or the poor . . . They pay at a higher rate, and as a group, they contribute a much larger share of the overall taxes collected by the federal government. The 10 percent of households with the highest incomes pay more than half of all federal taxes. They pay more than 70 percent of federal income taxes.”

So much for Obama-buddy multi-billionaire, Warren Buffett, so much for Obama’s wealth theories.

Regardless of his other misrepresentations, did we miss something here? Did the recession, when raising taxes was verboten, end and nobody noticed? Did we escape a double-dip recession that never really emerged from the initial dip? Is the sinister hand of George W. Bush, he who is and always be responsible for everything wrong in America, somehow involved?

Or, is Obama intent on continuing a financial malaise, committed to maintaining the deprivations of the unemployed, fostering more and more mortgage defaults, building an army of government-dependent people, conducting without declaring class warfare, all in the interests of breeding a general discontent which will propel him into a second term?

How cynical is that scenario!

Discontent and malaise most often work to the detriment of sitting presidents but this president is not your average chief executive.

. He has pre-empted the charge of class warfare by effectively saying, Well, it’s not, so there!

. He is immersed in various “green” scandals and “crony capitalism” and financial manipulation which betray the venality and incompetence of his administration yet he concedes no wrongdoing.

. He has mouthed hollow words of civility eminiscent of Rodney King while turning a blind eye to the extremist incivilities of his union troops’ efforts to stir up discord and division.

. He has increased the national debt by four trillion dollars in 2 1/2 years, a debt that must be paid by cour children and grandchildren.

. He has conceded Social Security and Medicare have to be fixed but has failed to propose any fixes in hopes Republicans rescue them and he can point fingers.

. He has foisted the trillion dollar Obamacare abomination on Americans, seizing one-seventh of the nation’s economy for the federal government.

Obama is again relying on gullible voters buying into his 2008 hopey-changey mantra and the mainstream media-created fantasy of “The Annointed One” to guide Campaign 2012 through the turbulent shoals of an economy in disarray and a nation verging on despair.

He may yet succeed.(See all sources at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5500.)

More Obama Articles

Obama and the World of Project Management

Barack Obama’s victory as the next president of the United States has led many to conclude that a lot of areas will soon be facing significant change. The challenge to keep to what already works well and to transform those that need improvement could be a staple within the new administration, especially since we are facing troubled times. They key factor is proper management, of course, and with Obama’s entry, everyone’s eyes are focused on how his goals would mesh with the realm of project management.

Let’s have a look at five priority areas. Here is my take on how they might influence project and program management:

1. Health care reform. Reform in health care is aimed at controlling costs and making health care more available and more affordable to many more people in the United States. On the cost control side, it would seem that we can expect companies and organizations of all sorts will put an increasing emphasis on accelerating cost-containment in their organizations.

While they are mostly already doing that, there are likely to be policy initiatives over time that will accelerate and facilitate that effort in certain ways.

Projects of the Six Sigma nature should be incorporated more into health care projects, particularly among care providers and employees of pharmaceutical firms. It could include rethinking of priorities in favor of cost control and containment. Based upon many statements made, we can expect emphasis on more efficient information systems to manage personal and general health care information. The move to make health care available to most, or all, American citizens would seem to be quite a logistical and administrative challenge, spawning further projects in information technology and records management.

2.

Energy. There has been a lot of talk about energy throughout the campaign, and hopefully not everything will shift as dramatically as energy prices have! But I think this will be a continuing source of projects of all sorts, and virtually everything in the energy field is big and requires expert project management skills. There are tremendous logistical and operational challenges throughout the whole supply chain, from extraction all the way through getting product to the consumer. Keeping some semblance of balance in that supply chain, especially in the face of erratic pricing and markets, makes that even more challenging.

There is likely to be an increased interest in alternative energy sources, including an emphasis on natural gas, drilling in new areas, wind energy, and solar energy. The key factor in my mind is the economics of each and tracking the variability in those factors, so that when changes come projects can be started rapidly. Given that most of these are large capital intensive projects, and that they are long term in nature, they will be hard to stop once started, and project selection and portfolio management will require exceptional skill.

3. Tax reform. Much emphasis has been put on tax fairness. This has been a clear indication that higher income individuals will receive higher tax rates. This could have an effect on consumer spending and possibly investment, thus effecting projects accordingly. It also may be that capital gains taxes will increase, and this will have a direct impact on the viability of projects many projects. The question is, how much of an impact, and specifically where?

My guess is that these tax policy changes will have a marginal impact as far as project managers go. I believe that those viable projects will remain viable, and only a few from the status quo will have to be changed. Of course in the short term, at least, the availability of money to finance many projects is a huge factor.

4. Education. Frankly, I am not sure at all what education reforms might be viable, but here are some ideas. Any educational service related to technology and the bringing of books, virtual classrooms, and interactive learning that bring efficiencies to the educational process will be considered. Other things that I think will be considered relate to customization of educational services or segments, such as charter schools who want to make their own innovative programs.

There may also be some macro changes in the educational system, related to local versus broader control of education. This type of thing would likely spawn information technology projects aimed at tying together information across local domains. Other changes in this area could relate to sharing teaching resources and flexibility across educational domains for both students and teachers.

5. Regulatory reform and infrastructure spending. There will likely an increased number of regulatory reform projects related to new financial regulations probably at the top of the list, just as there have been a plethora of Sarbanes-Oxley projects in the last few years, though there will be an increasing number of projects of that sort with the new changes to come.

Areas where such projects are most likely to occur include financial (at the top of the list) and environmental. Regulatory reform could have an impact on transportation, and the transportation infrastructure is likely to be the target of a great deal of fiscal spending. Any projects are likely to be large, requiring substantial professional project management, and many will also be information intensive.

See the author’s site, Project Management Training Online, for online Project Portfolio Management training courses for PDUs. For more ideas and insights on project portfolio management and strategy, see John’s post “Strategy Needs to Drive Project Portfolio Management” at PMcrunch.com.

Find More Obama Articles